Repository navigation
Conversation
added 6 commits
November 8, 2026 12:51
…till want to avoid a nonbasic variable at zero with positive upper bound
printf and assert, in HighsPostsolveStack::DuplicateColumn::undo
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## latest #3580 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 75.70% 75.71%
=======================================
Files 461 461
Lines 114020 114033 +13
Branches 17933 17933
=======================================
+ Hits 86322 86341 +19
+ Misses 27410 27404 -6
Partials 288 288 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Eliminates the
printfand assert, inHighsPostsolveStack::DuplicateColumn::undo, but still want to avoid a nonbasic variable at zero with positive upper bound, even though primal-dual and basis postsolve are correct in this case - see analysis inissue-3565.Checklist
latestbranchRelated issue
Closes #3565