Skip to content

catalog: add Claude Fable 5.2 and GPT-6.1 Sol to the model pickers - #837

Merged
chaitanyagiri merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
catalog/fable-5-2-gpt-6-1-sol
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

chaitanyagiri merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
catalog/fable-5-2-gpt-6-1-sol

Conversation

@chaitanyagiri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Adds two launched models to the catalog every installed app downloads. One file: docs/model-catalog.json, two lines.

Picker id (the exact --model value) Label Where
Claude Code claude-fable-5-2 Fable 5.2 first, above Fable 5.1
Codex gpt-6.1-sol GPT-6.1 Sol under GPT-6 Astra, above GPT-6 Sol (newest first within Sol, as GPT-6.1 Terra went in #796)

Ids checked against the makers' own lists on 10 Nov 2026:

  • Fable 5.2: Claude models overview (API id claude-fable-5-2, 1M context, 128K output). Claude Code 2.1.321 starts on it.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol: OpenAI model page and Codex models (codex -m gpt-6.1-sol, 500K context in Codex). The codex CLI 0.164.0 model list carries the same slug.

No other row moves; no default changes. Apps pick it up within 6 hours of the merge.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

- claude-fable-5-2 ("Fable 5.2") above Fable 5.1 in the Claude list.
- gpt-6.1-sol ("GPT-6.1 Sol") at the head of the Sol models in the Codex
  list, under GPT-6 Astra, the way GPT-6.1 Terra went in (#796).

Data only: docs/model-catalog.json, nothing else.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚫 This PR is missing its before/after evidence

Every pull request here has to show its work. Screenshots or a short screen recording, before the change and after it.

  • Before — no image or video under that heading
  • After — no image or video under that heading

How to fix it: edit the description, keep the ### Before and ### After headings from the template, and drag an image or video under each. GitHub uploads it inline. This check re-runs the moment you save.

A bug fix with no visible surface still needs it: show the failing behaviour, then the same steps passing. A terminal recording is fine.

Genuinely nothing to show — a CI tweak, a typo, a dependency bump? A maintainer can apply the no-visual-change label. Please don't ask unless it truly has no observable effect.

📖 CONTRIBUTING.md → Evidence is mandatory

@chaitanyagiri
chaitanyagiri merged commit 8649a12 into main Nov 10, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant