feature request: sessions in the intelmq-api #42

Activity

1. aaronkaplan

   added

   questionFurther information is requestedFurther information is requested

   on Feb 2, 2023
2. sebix commented on Feb 2, 2023

   

   sebix

   on Feb 2, 2023

   Member

   More actions

   Then system administrators should never flush the complete redis DB to reset IntelMQ's caches and bots, as that would also delete the user accounts. May have unintended consequences. We should document that well.

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by kamil-certat
3. aaronkaplan commented on Feb 2, 2023

   

   aaronkaplan

   on Feb 2, 2023 via email

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   Okay. That’s a good point then. ---MobileOn 02.02.2023, at 11:37, Sebastian ***@***.***> wrote: Then system administrators should never flush the complete redis DB to reset IntelMQ's caches and bots, as that would also delete the user accounts. May have unintended consequences. We should document that well. —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
4. kamil-certat commented on Jun 15, 2023

   

   kamil-certat

   on Jun 15, 2023

   Contributor

   More actions

   Sessio management can be in redis, but user management need to be held separated. Anyway, I would suggest redis or sqlite as two possibilities, it's such a small API, that I don't think it makes sense to push people to do the change.