Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ara-stock
requested review from
0xrusowsky,
DaniPopes,
grandizzy,
mattsse and
onbjerg
as code owners
October 9, 2026 00:42
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
StdSecp256k1.isOnCurve(x, y)only comparesy² mod Pwithx³ + 7 mod P, so it also returnstruefor non-canonical coordinatesx >= Pory >= Pthat are congruent to a curve point. For example,(1 + P, y)is accepted because(1, y)is on the curve.This disagrees with the go-ethereum function referenced in the code (
crypto/secp256k1/curve.go,IsOnCurve), which returnsfalsewhenx >= P || y >= P. It also disagrees with the library's own docs ("Affine coordinates(x, y)are canonically in[0, P)") and withisIdentityProjective, which already requiresy < P. If a test validates a public key withisOnCurve, a value like(x, y + P)passes, andtoAddressthen gives a different address.Solution
Return
falsefromisOnCurvewhen either coordinate is not in[0, P), and say so in the natspec. Add a test with two on-curve points (x = 1, and a point withy = 1) where addingPto one coordinate still fits inuint256. Before the change, the new test fails withassertion failed. After the change, it passes.forge fmt --checkis clean on the touched files.I used an AI assistant (Claude) while preparing this. I reproduced the issue and checked the fix and tests myself.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code