Skip to content

racon use large memory than that in raven #68

Open

Description

@xiekunwhy

Hi,

I found that racon use much more memory (several times) than the racon module in raven, why? And can we use raven as a polisher?

Best,
Kun

Activity

  1. rvaser commented on May 2, 2022

    @rvaser
    Collaborator

    Hi Kun,
    in Raven the sequences are stored compressed at all times (qualities are reduced to averages of 64 bases). There were plans to propagate that to Racon as well, replacing the quality compression with something better, but I never got the time to do it.

    In current form, polishing part of Raven cannot be used separately.

    Best regards,
    Robert

  2. xiekunwhy commented on May 24, 2022

    @xiekunwhy
    Author

    I see, thank you for your reply, and I am waiting for low memory cost racon version.

    Best regards,
    Kun

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions