Repository navigation
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 48 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configuration
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configuration
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 SummarySummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe example and development dependency declarations update DuckDB versions or constraints. The integration tests use ChangesDuckDB Updates
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Change: Other Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to CI remains reproducible and the DuckDB integration updates are compatible with the locked version. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 5 functions across 2 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.) ✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
… into chore/unpin-duckdb # Conflicts: # pixi.lock # pyproject.toml
drops the duckdb version pin from dev dependencies.