You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For TurtleBot4 simulation tests that declare `/scan` as a watched topic, either:
1. useful `sensor_msgs/msg/LaserScan` samples should be recorded, or
2. the launch/test profile should explicitly mark scan coverage as disabled/unavailable for empty-world runs.
This would distinguish motion-control campaigns, where scan may be irrelevant, from sensor/hazard campaigns, where scan evidence is required.
Actual behaviour
In empty/minimal-world headless campaigns, the motion-control findings were valid, but `/scan` did not provide useful evidence for sensor or obstacle-related checks.
The previous 1000-round report observed:
```textAll 941 saved error rosbags were parseable and had complete /odom plus /wheel_vels observations./scan was absent in all error rosbags because the campaign used the empty world;this is not a motion-control bug signal.
The latest report similarly concluded:
Empty-world scan false positive: not applicable to the reported acceleration bugs.
Scan absence or no returns are not the triggering oracle class here.
So this is not a motion-control bug. It is an observability/test-profile issue: empty-world simulation can make /scan unavailable or uninformative while users may still assume scan-based behavior is being exercised.
### Error messages
```bash
No terminal crash. Observed analysis result:
/scan was absent in empty-world error rosbags; scan was not the triggering oracle class.
To Reproduce
1. Start TurtleBot4 Standard simulation in an empty/minimal world.
2. Record `/scan`, `/odom`, `/cmd_vel`, and `/clock`.
3. Run a short motion command sequence or motion-control fuzz run.
4. Inspect the rosbag for `/scan` samples and useful finite scan ranges.
5. Observe that motion-control topics are present, while `/scan` may be absent or not useful for scan/hazard checks.
Other notes
This should probably be handled as documentation/profile behavior rather than a controller bug. A useful improvement would be to document two explicit modes:
1. motion-control mode: empty/minimal world, `/scan` optional or marked unavailable
2. sensor/hazard mode: obstacle world, `/scan` required with useful finite ranges
Activity